Search Results for "Assistant Surgeon (General)"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Udal Harishchandra Nanak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness and medical evidence contradicted his version.

The appellant, Sk. Mohin Sk. Munshi, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Sk. Rais Sk. Gani. The prosecuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18A Notice Procedure. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Explain Before Filing Complaint Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd and others, filed writ petitions challenging the order dated 24 September 2014 passed by the Chief Judic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms That Employee of Government-Owned Company Not Holding Civil Post Under Union; Article 311 Protection Denied. Hindustan Steel Ltd.'s Independent Corporate Existence Precludes Characterisation of Its Posts as Civil Posts Under the Union Under Article 311 of Constitution.

The dispute arose from the termination of service of an Assistant Surgeon employed by Hindustan Steel Ltd., Ranchi. The appellant, S. L. Agarwal, chal...