Search Results for "trust shares"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trust shares"

460 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the trial court's findings on the existence of joint family property and the share of each party were based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Section 115 of CPC.

5 Dec 2025

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), against the judgment and decree dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Clinic Registration Under Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 — CMS-ED Qualification Not Recognized as Medical Qualification Under the Act.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Dr. Annaiah N., a medical practitioner running Sangeetha Clinic, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

24 Aug 2023

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Medical Establishments under Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 2017. Medical Profession Held to Have Commercial Aspect; Registration Requirement for Nursing Homes with Ten or More Employees is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Clinical Establishments Act.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Dr. Pradeep Arora, a medical practitioner and owner of Arora Hospital in Nagpur, challenged the definition of 'establishment' under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Execution. Court finds that the Will and Codicil were not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to lack of attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the documents.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a Miscellaneous Petition (No. 39 of 2004) and a Testamentary Suit (No. 4 of 2005), both relating to the e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Dispel Doubts. Court holds that propounders must prove due execution and testamentary capacity beyond suspicion, and failure to examine attesting witnesses or explain unnatural bequests leads to rejection of probate.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two testamentary proceedings: a Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 233 of 2004 and a Testamentar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that a second appeal under Section 100 CPC is not maintainable against concurrent findings of fact unless substantial question of law arises.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to decree specific performance of agreement to sell, finding plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Agreement to Sell. Trial court's finding that no agreement was executed and no advance paid upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)