Search Results for "superannuation benefits"

905 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 905 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Family Pension of Deceased Part-Time Librarian — Service Not Pensionable Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Part-time service does not qualify as pensionable service; no right to family pension arises.

The petitioner, Shri Mukund Marutirao Jagtap, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/letter dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Retiral Benefits Case — Employee Who Joined Another Service Without Sanction Not Entitled to Pension. Abandonment of Service Disentitles Employee to Voluntary Retirement Benefits Under UP Fundamental Rules.

The case involves two appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The respondent, Dr. Sudarshana Chatterje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order on Retirement Age and Back Wages. Workman Held Entitled to Wages Including Back Wages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, M/s Sirsat Lodge, challenged an order dated 12.11.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Labour and Employment, Panaji, in CLE/(REC-17)/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Election Petition Case Holding Candidate Disqualified for Holding Office of Profit Under Government. Lawyer on Railway Panel and Professor in Government College Deemed to Hold Office of Profit Under Representation of the People Act, 1951.

This appeal arose from the election of the appellant to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly in February 1957. The election was challenged by the r...