Search Results for "section 34"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Deferral of Prosecution Authorisation Under Section 34 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Government Can Defer Consideration of Prosecution Authorisation Pending Adjudication of Underlying Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of the Act.

2 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/S International Trimmings and Labels India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

25 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor Despite Pending CBI Investigation. The court held that pendency of criminal investigation does not automatically justify stay of arbitration proceedings and that the award was not against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 6 January 2009 passed by a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Net Delay Compensation Concept Not Permissible Under Contract. The Court held that the Arbitrator's approach of awarding compensation based on 'net delay' was contrary to the express terms of the contract and remanded the counterclaim for fresh adjudication.

26 Jun 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a construction contract d...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Perverse Findings. Arbitrator's Failure to Consider Admitted Documents and Ledger Accounts Constitutes Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd., a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator Disqualification in Multi-State Cooperative Dispute. Failure to Disclose Bias and Withdrawal from Similar Matters Constitutes Grounds for Setting Aside Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, The Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law. Court held that the scope of interference under Article 227 is limited to jurisdictional errors and not reappreciation of evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s. Sai Shradha Developers and its partners, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Cour...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)