Search Results for "majority settlement"

424 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 424 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Land Acquired Under 1894 Act but Not Compensated Due to Unfulfilled Alternate Land Offer Entitles Petitioners to Compensation Under 2013 Act.

The petitioners, Shital Anna Walawade, Neminath Anna Walawade, and Suman Anna Walawade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Partially Rejecting Amendment in Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Amendment Sought After Limitation Period Not Allowed as It Would Introduce New Grounds Beyond Scope of Section 34.

The Appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Grounds of Detention Were Vague and Stale.

The petitioner, Karnaram Lumbaji Choudhary, challenged a detention order dated 8th March 2018 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment Introducing Multi-Member Wards and Multiple Votes in Municipal Elections — Amendment to Section 5 of BPMC Act and Section 10 of MMC Act Valid as Intra Vires the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Vinayak Bhiva Bhilare and Miss. Vaishali Chandane challenging Act No. XXVI of 2011, which amended Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Indefinite Curfew Imposed Due to Burial Dispute in Mominpura Area. Court holds that curfew under Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a permanent measure and must be proportionate to the threat.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...