Search Results for "disciplinary jurisdiction"

1781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Departmental Inquiry Against Headmaster Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Alleged Procedural Violations Including Defective Inquiry Committee and Denial of Statement of Allegations Examined.

The petitioner, a Headmaster of a private school governed by the MEPS Act and Rules, challenged his termination following a departmental inquiry. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Teacher Terminated Without Inquiry by Minority School. Termination Order Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Section 9 of MEPS Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Shaikh Wasim Shaikh Salim, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Hazi Leookman Urdu Primary School, run by respondent No.1 society,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension and Departmental Inquiry Against Municipal Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Passed by Municipal Commissioner Instead of General Body Held Invalid Under Section 57 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Mr. Sanjay G. Gharat, an employee of the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC), challenged the suspension order dated 18th Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Granting Pensionary Benefits to Pre-1986 Retirees. Rule 37 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 held applicable to all employees irrespective of retirement date, as cut-off date was arbitrary and discriminatory.

The Union of India filed eight writ petitions challenging a common order dated 3rd April 2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Be...