Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Contract but Continuous Offer, Plaint Discloses Cause of Action.

The appellant, M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15.07.2019 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1940 OF 1999

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.

The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...