Search Results for "belated plea"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition and Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Landlord's bonafide need for personal cultivation under Section 33B and default in rent under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from agricultural tenancy disputes over the same suit property. The landlord, Tukaram Maruti Dubal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Due to Invalid Service of Notice. Service of notice on a relative who is not a family member and not authorized to accept is not valid under Section 35(3B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, members of Gram Panchayat Bhoyni, challenged the order dated 04/09/2015 passed by the Additional Collector, Washim, which allowed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute Between Contractor and Sub-Contractor. Court finds that invocation of bank guarantee was fraudulent and would cause irretrievable injustice to the petitioner.

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructure Limited, a civil and structural construction company, entered into a sub-contract with respondent No. 1, Siemen...