WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"
407 result(s) found
Found 407 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of C-1 Building Despite IBC Moratorium — Development Rights Not Asset of Corporate Debtor. Cooperative Housing Society's Right to Redevelop Its Property Upheld Against Resolution Professional's Interference.
11 Sep 2024The Petitioner, Kher Nagar Sukhsadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned a building on land leased from MHADA. In 2005, it entered into a Develop...
- 762
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Members in Cooperative Housing Society Redevelopment Dispute — Majority Decision Upheld. Court holds that minority members cannot stall redevelopment process approved by 80 out of 88 members, and objections regarding additional area do not justify interim injunction.
8 Nov 2023The case involves an appeal by 8 members (appellants) of Neel Shantiniketan Co-operative Housing Society Limited against an order of the City Civil Co...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
5 Jun 2023The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by BEST Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — False Involvement of Bus Not Proved. Tribunal's finding of negligence and compensation upheld as eye witness and FIR supported involvement of BEST bus.
12 Apr 2023The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased Virendrnath was knocked down by a BEST bus on 24th July 2000 at about 10:00 p.m. The cl...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.
23 Jul 2021The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...
- 334
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Waqf Board Notice on Land Exchange — Exchange of Waqf Property Allegedly Without Required Sanction Under Section 32(2)(j) of Waqf Act, 1995. Court Examines Whether Notice Was Final Decision or Show-Cause, and Whether Exchange Valid Despite Internal Board Procedural Issues.
9 Oct 2017The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner, challenged a notice issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Slum Dwellers Against Eviction for Redevelopment. Non-members of cooperative society lack locus to challenge Slum Rehabilitation Authority's eviction order.
16 Sep 2013The case involves an appeal filed by four individuals (Ramesh Fakira Lohkare, Arun Baban Kadam, Ramesh Rama Dhakrao, and Suryakant Janardhan Sonawane)...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Regularization of Unauthorized Construction and Use of Premises for Commercial Purposes. Court upholds BMC's action under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act for removal of unauthorized work, restricting use of first floor to data processing unit only.
27 Apr 2012The petitioners, proprietors of various shops, challenged an order rejecting their application for regularization of additional work carried out witho...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes BEST's Disconnection Order for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Electricity Consumer Entitled to Hearing Before Disconnection for Alleged Theft Under Section 163 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
7 Apr 2005The petitioner, M/s Neel Kamal Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, challenged an order dated 20th June 2001 pas...
- 111
