WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"
554 result(s) found
Found 554 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales.
11 Dec 2024The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) se...
- 535
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Deemed Conveyance of Land to Cooperative Housing Society — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Land Was Acquired Under MRTP Act and Allotted to Society. The court held that the petitioner failed to prove his ownership of Final Plot No.190, as the land had vested in the State upon acquisition and was validly conveyed to the respondent society under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.
11 Aug 2023The petitioner, Allarkha Ismail, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a deemed conveyance executed in favor of Respondent No...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Composition of Tree Authority Under Maharashtra Trees Act — Nominated Members Cannot Exceed Elected Members. Interpretation of Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 requires parity between elected and nominated members in Tree Authority.
19 Jul 2019The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the composition of the Tree Authority for the Municipal Corporat...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Councillor for Spouse's Unauthorized Construction Under Section 44(1)(e) of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court held that the provision imposes strict liability on the Councillor for constructions by her spouse, without requiring her knowledge or involvement.
22 Apr 2019The appellant, Sampada Yogesh Waghdhare, was elected as a Municipal Councillor and later as President of the Council on 11.02.2015. The second respond...
- 379
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures by Thane Municipal Corporation. Court upholds municipal action under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notices were issued and opportunity of hearing was given.
26 Feb 2016The petitioners, Mr. Shailesh Manohar Patil, Mr. Ram Hari Egade, and Mr. Manohar Rama Salvi, filed three separate writ petitions under Article 226 of ...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Owners' Petition Against Refusal to Register Sale Deeds in MIDC Area. Notification Under Section 1(3) of MIDC Act Does Not Bar Registration of Plots in Layouts Sanctioned Prior to Notification.
9 Apr 2015The petitioners, land owners, challenged a communication dated 22.1.2015 from the Sub-Registrar refusing to register sale deeds of plots in their layo...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.
22 Jul 2011The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Town Planning Dispute — Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Section 149 of MRTP Act, Need Not Decide Other Issues on Merits. Once Jurisdiction Is Found Absent, Court Becomes Functus Officio and Must Return Plaint Without Adjudicating Other Issues.
15 Dec 2006The case arose from a suit filed by Jagdish Hari Thatte and six others against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and the State of Maharashtr...
- 51
