Search Results for "Licence fee"

750 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 750 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Entertainment Duty on Permit Rooms and Beer Bars with Live Orchestra. Levy of Rs. 50,000 or Rs. 25,000 per month is a valid fiscal measure not infringing Article 19(1)(g) and does not constitute double taxation.

The petitioner, Ashok Ganapati Gupta, proprietor of M/s. Ashoka Restaurant and Bar, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Car Parking License Dispute. Clause 15 of License Agreement Permitted Change of Location Without Compensation, and No Evidence of Loss Was Found.

The petitioner, Garuda Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., was granted a license by the Airport Authority of India (AAI) to operate a car parking facility at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Mesne Profits Claim in Ownership Dispute Over Flat. Court holds that plaintiffs established ownership of suit flat and defendants are liable to pay mesne profits for illegal occupation.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Tarla N. Morjaria, Mrs. Usha S. Somana, and Mrs. Bharati V. Tanna, filed a suit against the defendants, Mr. Bipin Hiralal Shah an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...