Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Execution Sale Dispute for Limitation Determination. High Court's Order Setting Aside Auction Sale Set Aside for Ignoring Supreme Court's Direction to Decide Limitation First.

The dispute arises from execution proceedings of a decree passed in favour of Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Coop Bank Ltd. (R2) against M/s. Abhilasha Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Madras High Court Decision on Validity of Security Bond and Priority in Rateable Distribution. Charge Created by Security Bond Held Valid Despite Lack of Attestation; Decree Holder Entitled to Priority Under Section 73(1) Proviso (c) Code of Civil Procedure.

The appellant (M. L. Abdul Jabhar Sahib) instituted C.S. No. 56 of 1953 on the Original Side of the Madras High Court against Hajee Ahmed Batcha for r...