Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

722 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 722 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Revision Against Rejection of Decree on Admission in Property Dispute. Court Finds No Clear Admission of Title by Defendants in Previous Counter-Claims, Upholding Trial Court's Order Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by the Plaintiff challenging the Trial Court's order rejecting his application for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Second Appeal in Eviction Suit Based on Lease Expiry. Court holds that under Section 111(a) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a lease determined by efflux of time does not require notice to quit, and the Burmah Shell Acquisition Act does not create a statutory tenancy.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL) against a decree of eviction passed by the trial court and confirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Son's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order to Vacate Mother's Tenement Under Senior Citizens Act. Mother's right to reside in her own property upheld against son's claim of ownership.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Suryakant Kisan Pawar, the son of respondent No.2, Smt. Kusum Kisan Pawar, a senior citizen. The mother own...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Favor of Tenant in Land Dispute with Agricultural Corporation. The court restored the trial court's interim injunction protecting the petitioner's possession based on prima facie tenancy rights and balance of convenience.

The petitioner, Baliram Dagadu Mundfane, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff's title based on Hakkupatra grant upheld by both courts below; no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Bai, was the defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, P. S...