Search Results for "permissible classification"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court's Interim Order in Wage Increment Dispute - Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's Policy Modification Upheld Against Employee Unions

The High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation challenging the Industrial Court's interim order that stayed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Personal Secretaries for Pay Refixation by Merging Special Pay into Basic Pay. The court held that special pay granted for higher responsibilities must be merged upon promotion to a higher post, quashing the state's order denying the benefit.

The petitioners, an association of Personal Assistants, Private Secretaries, and Senior Private Secretaries of the Bombay High Court, along with an in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Age Limit Rule for District Judge Recruitment — Rule 5(3) of Karnataka Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 Held Valid. Petitioner's challenge to age bar of 35 years for direct recruitment dismissed as reasonable classification under Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioner, Vijaya Kumar, applied for the post of District Judge under the Karnataka Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, pursuant to a not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Discharge of Civil Judge in Absorption Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's discharge from service without notice or inquiry held illegal as she was absorbed under Absorption Rules, not a fresh appointee, and had rendered over seven years of service.

The petitioner, Haleema, was initially appointed as a Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) on probation on 02.07.1999 and joined on 26.07.1999. She was later relieved...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...