Search Results for "notice before mutation"

788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Orders in Land Mutation Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties. Revisional Authority's Order Ignoring Settlement Set Aside; Mutation Directed in Terms of Compromise.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Hothi Jalubha Godji Pathuji and others, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Registered Sale Deed — Title Not Extinguished by Subsequent Mutation or Revenue Entries. Registered sale deed confers absolute title and possession; subsequent revenue entries or mutation do not affect title unless set aside by competent court.

The appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the plaintiff-appellant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Correction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Petitioners' challenge to correction of revenue records fails as they were not parties to the original proceeding and no notice was required under Section 9 of the Code.

The petitioners, 40 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Act Land Transfer Dispute. Petitioner failed to prove that respondent No.4 was not an agriculturist under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Nilesh Ravindra Varode, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Plaintiffs' Title and Possession. The court affirmed that the suit property was self-acquired by the plaintiffs' grandmother and not ancestral, and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a property dispute over Gat No. 5/6, area 1.21 HR, situated at village Khamkhed, and a residential house in Jalgaon (Jamod). The pla...