Search Results for "general provident fund"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal, Upholds ESI Court's Quashing of Damages Order Under Section 85-B of ESI Act Due to Time Bar Under Section 77(1A) Proviso.

The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, which challenged the ESI Court's order quashing a damages order und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Compassionate Appointment for Disabled Son of Former Bank Employee. Voluntary Retirement on Medical Grounds Does Not Create Entitlement to Compassionate Appointment Under Canara Bank Pension Regulations.

The petitioner, Pramod Govind Sagalgile, was an employee of Canara Bank who joined as a Clerk in 1989 and was later promoted to Officer. Due to seriou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Application of Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Deceased was a 25-year-old police constable; Court restored compensation with multiplier of 18, 50% future prospects, and 9% interest.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim. On 23.07.2012, Sachin Kumar, a 25-year-old police constable, died in a collision caused by a ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Full Retirement Benefits to Retired Employee. Retirement Benefits Constitute Property Under Article 300A of Constitution of India, Cannot Be Withheld Without Legal Authority.

The petitioner, Shri Babulal Fakira Vasaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondent...