Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Chunilal Bhill, through his wife Daxa Ghanshyam Bhill, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention Under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vikeshbhai Babulal Kharadi, was preventively detained by an order dated 24.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Vishal @ Jadiyo S/o. Dharmnath Yadav, through his mother Yadav Mintadevi Dharmnath, challenged the preventive detention order dated 01...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance — Detention Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind

The petitioner, Anand Ramanji Abhaji Thakor, was preventively detained by an order dated 04.02.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Divyang @ Nanu Virbahadur Rana, was preventively detained by an order dated 28.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Vadodara ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents do not justify preventive detention without showing threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sahilkhan @ Mota Maniyar Rashidahemad Pathan, through his mother Sama Sultana Rashidahemad Pathan, challenged a preventive detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order — Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind

The petitioner, Shravan @ Ashwin Hakralalji Kharadi, was preventively detained by an order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order — Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Fardin @ Bokha Soyebbhai Kureshi, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, under Section 2(c) of the Guja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Nirmalsing Rajendrasing Tank Chikhligar, through his father Rajendrasing Ratansing Chikhligar, challenged a preventive detention order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their ...