Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar v. The State of Maharashtra
27 Jun 2025The petitioner, Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code...
Search Results for "constitutional guarantee"
874 result(s) found
Found 874 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Public Interest Litigation for Rejuvenation of Godavari River Due to Extensive Pollution — Directs Implementation of NEERI Recommendations and Preventive Measures. Pollution of Godavari River by untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and religious activities violates public trust doctrine and Article 51A(g); preventive steps ordered under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
18 Dec 2018This public interest litigation was filed by citizens of Nashik seeking directions to clean and prevent pollution of river Godavari, the second longes...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.
21 Nov 2006Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...
- 29
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds 10% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Clause as Valid in Commercial Contracts. Clause requiring deposit-at-call of 10% of claim amount before invoking arbitration is not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14.
11 Mar 2019The case arose from a tender issued in 2008 by the Punjab State Water Supply & Sewerage Board for water supply and sewerage projects. The appellant, M...
- 230
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Pre-deposit Condition Under Punjab VAT Act. Condition of 25% Pre-deposit for First Appeal Held Not Unconstitutional, but Appellate Authority Has Inherent Power to Grant Interim Relief.
1 Jan 2019The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which upheld the validity of Section 62(...
- 346
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Women Army Officers' Right to Permanent Commission in Landmark Gender Equality Judgment. Court holds that women SSC officers are entitled to PC at par with male counterparts, rejecting discriminatory service conditions.
17 Feb 2020The case concerns a batch of appeals filed by the Ministry of Defence against a Delhi High Court judgment directing the grant of Permanent Commission ...
- 885
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Pay Parity for Section Officers in High Court Administration with Mantralaya Staff. The court upheld the principle of parity of pay scales between High Court staff and State Government staff based on a 1965 agreement.
9 Aug 2016The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs State to Grant Revised Pay Scales to High Court Section Officers on Par with Mantralaya Staff — Parity Principle Upheld. The Court held that the long-standing principle of pay parity between High Court staff and Mantralaya staff must be maintained, and directed the State to apply the revised pay scales from the date of the Government Resolution dated 11 February 2013.
9 Aug 2016The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...
- 87
High Court
High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.
20 Apr 2018The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Challenge to MoEF Notification Transferring NGT Jurisdiction Over Goa Matters to Delhi Principal Bench. The Court Examines Legality of Transfer Without Public Consultation and Lack of Alternative Arrangements Under NGT Act.
11 Oct 2017The High Court of Bombay at Goa took suo motu cognizance on 21st August 2017 upon learning of a notification by the Ministry of Environment, Forest an...
- 49
