Search Results for "Section 57(3)"

425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Evidence Linking Detenu to Offences. Detenu's Name Not in FIRs and In-camera Statements Not Verified by Competent Authority.

The petitioner, Santosh Subhash Koli, through his mother Sunandabai Subhash Koli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows State Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Road Maintenance Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's Award Set Aside for Exceeding Claim, Scope of Reference, and Rewriting Contract Terms.

The State of Haryana appealed against a High Court order dismissing its challenge to an arbitral award in favor of M/s. Shiv Shankar Construction Co. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Partition Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Family Property Partition Decree Confirmed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals arising from a partition suit concerning family property. The appellant in Second Appeal No.164 of 2002, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as trap witnesses were interested and evidence of demand and acceptance was not credible.

The appellant, Chandrakant Kisan Pujari, was a Noting Assistant at the District Industries Centre, Solapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, San...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Sample Division and Sealing Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Girishkumar A. Dedhia, for o...