Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Seeking Modification of Interest Award — Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion on Interest Rate and Period Not Interfered With

The Petitioner, IMC Limited (formerly United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's rejection of escalation claim due to absence of escalation clause upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, M/s. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co., a registered partnership firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 14 January 2009 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove harassment or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellants, Arjun Babarao Parche, Babarao Bhimrao Parche, and Kamlabai Babarao Parche, were convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ward...