Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sharad Manga Tayade, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge (ACB), Nanded in Special (ACB) Case No.7 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaysing Nayrana Bidgar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Possessing Excess Sugar Without Licence Under Essential Commodities Act. Appellant Found with 22 Quintals of Sugar, Exceeding 10 Quintal Limit for Unlicensed Retailers Under Maharashtra Sugar Dealers' Licensing Order, 1963.

The appellant, Ashok Nankram Ahuja, was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalgaon, in Summary Case No.6/1996 for contravening an order under Section 3 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure of Charas from Hotel Room Vitiated as Mandatory Procedural Safeguards Not Followed.

The appellant, Dhansur Ghartimagar, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 122 IPC for Preparation to Wage War Against Government of India. Possession of Arms Without Licence Under Arms Act Also Upheld.

The appellants, Javed @ Java Ahmed Mohammed Akbar Bhatt and others, were convicted by the trial court under Section 122 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prohibition Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 66(2) Mandate. Failure to Send Sample Quantity for Chemical Analysis as Required by Section 66(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The applicant, Smt. Rozia Alex Trinedat, was convicted by the trial court under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for being in poss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bawasingh Puransingh Khaira, was convicted by the Special Judge of Greater Bombay in Special Case No. 24/89 under the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses — Non-Compliance with Sections 55 and 57 of NDPS Act, 1985, Causes Prejudice to Accused. State Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession of Brown Sugar Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, dated 15/7/1994, acquitting the respondent-accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Information in Writing Renders Search and Seizure Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23-8-1988 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, acquitting the resp...