Search Results for "income tax penalty"

553 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 553 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes TPO Order in Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Demerger Transaction. Held that transfer pricing provisions under Section 92 of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not apply to a demerger approved by High Court where assets and liabilities are transferred at book value without any consideration.

The petitioner, Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Benett, Coleman and Company Ltd (BCCL), was engaged in distributio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Municipal Commissioner's Orders in Property Tax Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders Set Aside as Commissioner Acted Without Jurisdiction and Failed to Consider Relevant Material Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, M/s. Aadya Motor Car Company Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...