Search Results for "exparte proceedings"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Sets Aside Appellate Order for Non-Compliance with Section 29 of D.V. Act. Appellate Court Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant Before Setting Aside Conviction Order.

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa B.C., filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act) against her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee Dismissed for Corruption. Non-examination of Complainant in Domestic Enquiry Vitiated the Enquiry, Making Dismissal Disproportionate Under Industrial Law.

The respondent, Ravindra Adhar Gosavi, joined the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) as a driver in 1990 and was later promoted to A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Family Court Ex-Parte Order and DV Act Complaint as Frivolous. Family Court's Direction to Proceed Ex-Parte Upheld and DV Act Complaint Cannot Be Quashed as It Is Not a Criminal Proceeding Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Natarajan Sundaresan, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging orders passed in family court and magistrate p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Ex Parte Restoration Order Due to Misleading Adjournment — Defendants Denied Opportunity of Hearing. Court holds that restoration of suit without notice to defendants violates principles of natural justice and Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioner, Patel Engineering Limited, was the original defendant in Short Cause Suit No.2987 of 2002 filed by the respondent, United Real Estate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Air India, Upholds Dismissal of Air Hostess for Unauthorized Absence After Maternity Leave. The court held that the Industrial Tribunal's order of reinstatement was perverse and that the employer's decision to dismiss was justified under the Model Standing Orders.

The litigation between Air India Limited (appellant) and Ms. Shashikala Jatav (respondent) has been ongoing for two decades. The respondent was employ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Notice Based on Division Bench Order. Division Bench order, even if ex parte, is binding on Single Bench and cannot be collaterally challenged in recovery proceedings.

The petitioner, Banwarilal Laxminarayan Sharma, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated 29.09.1997 issued by the Labour Court, Nashik ...