Search Results for "confession"

986 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 986 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's retraction of confession and non-supply of the retraction letter violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Anju Madan Lalwani, wife of Madan Vishindas Lalwani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder in Stabbing Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Accused's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Stabbing Deceased Multiple Times Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive.

The appellant, Clive Ellens, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Valentin Stephen Dias and sentenced to life im...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Alone Insufficient Without Victim's Testimony.

The appellant, Imran Shamim Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 923 of 2013 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband and daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Kusum Sagun Malmanke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of her husband Sagun Tatoba Malmanke ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 3/7/1989 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No.39 of 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Marital Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of axe at appellant's instance held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

The appellant, Mallappa Chanappa Nidoni, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of his wife Kalavati and for causing d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Wife's Death — Reduces Sentence to Six Years. Circumstantial Evidence of Axe Recovery and Blood Stains Insufficient to Prove Intent for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, but Establishes Knowledge Under Section 304 Part II IPC.

The appellant, Mahendra Tularam Deshmukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, for the murder of his wife Nirmala Deshmukh under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Narco Analysis Order Against Accused in Bank Fraud Case — Consent Not Voluntary and Violates Article 20(3). Narco analysis without free consent amounts to testimonial compulsion under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Mrs. Rajeshree Aman Hemani, was an accused in Criminal Case No.19 of 2005 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, arising out of...