Search Results for "belated reply"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "belated reply"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

30 Sep 2016

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enhanced Compensation to Co-Owners in Land Acquisition Case. Court Directs Payment at Rs.20 per sq m for 1/4th Share Despite Non-Acceptance by Other Co-Owners.

25 Aug 2016

The petitioners, co-owners of land in Village Sal, Bicholim Taluka, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents (Special Land Acquisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Tender Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Redevelopment Tender Process. Court Held That Appellant Failed to Show Any Legal Right to Be Considered as Developer and That Balance of Convenience Was Against Granting Injunction.

7 Apr 2016

The appellant, Ornate Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking to restrain Respondent No.1, the Abhyuday Nagar Sahakar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award Due to Arbitrariness in Technical Evaluation. Petitioner's Bid Rejected Without Proper Consideration of Clarifications, Court Directs Reconsideration.

17 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Kartikay Exploration and Mining Services Pvt. Ltd., challenged the award of a tender by the National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Eviction Petitions Against Tenants in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord's Bona Fide Need Not Established. The court held that the trust failed to prove its reasonable and bona fide requirement for the suit premises under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, as no evidence of any decision to use the premises was produced.

2 Dec 2015

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Khasagi (Private) Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charitable Trust, through its trustees, against two tenants,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demand for Additional Premium for Extension of Time to Complete Construction — Period of Five Years for Completion Computed from Date of Registration of Agreement to Lease, Not from Date of Possession. The court held that the agreement to lease is a license and the period for completing construction under MIDC allotment runs from its registration, not from possession.

30 Mar 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Paramhari Engineers, a proprietary concern, was allotted a plot of land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MI...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Maha Lok Adalat Order Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Change Report Under Section 22 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Barred by Delay of Over Two Years.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Rajabhau Damodar Raikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Maha ...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)