Search Results for "agriculturists"

445 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 445 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Held That Order of Rejection Is Not Appealable Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC as It Does Not Amount to Refusal of Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 1 or 2 CPC.

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Jamkhandi, dated 18.01.2018, rejecting their application for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of PIL Seeking Inquiry into Irregularities in Government Works. Court Directs Authorities to Conduct Inquiry and Take Action in Accordance with Law.

The petitioners, Bapu Ukha Mali and Dattatraya Vasant Bachhav, residents of Dahivel village in Sakri taluka, Dhule district, filed a Public Interest L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Partition in Scheduled Tribe Family Based on Custom — Custom of Succession Among Bhil Tribe Recognized as Entitling Daughter to Father's Share

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendants (Bhagga Damma Bhil and Shama Bhagga Bhil) against the judgment of the District Judge, Dhu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not re-hearing the appeal.

The judgment pertains to a review application filed by the appellants in First Appeal No. 620 of 1996, seeking review of the judgment and order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case - Claimants Awarded Higher Market Value and Separate Compensation for Structures and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1500 per R for Jirayat Land Based on Sale Instances Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned land in village Kuslumb, Taluka Patoda, District Beed, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation for Land at Thippasandra Village.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge which held that the acquisition proceedings in respect o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...