Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Moratorium on Urban Co-operative Bank. RBI Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Are Binding and Not Subject to Challenge Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate Granted to Executors of Will — Will Proved in Manner Required by Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872

The appeal arose from a probate proceeding concerning the Will of Purvez Burjor Dalal, a Parsi who died on 7th December 2011. The appellant, Manek Dar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Forest Officers for Non-Compliance of Commissioner's Order Under Disabilities Act. Commissioner Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Not a 'Court' for Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Ku. Asha d/o Tribhuvan Dongare, was appointed as a Forest Guard in the Forest Department of Maharashtra on a post reserved for handica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...