Search Results for "Reply Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6844 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6844 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to PSS Guidelines Exemption as Market Committees Assert Entitlement to Fees under Section 31 of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court examined the validity of clause B(ii) which required State exemption from all duties on PSS operations.

8 Jun 2021

The writ petition was filed by the Maharashtra State Market Committee Co-operative Federation Ltd., representing over 290 Agricultural Produce Market ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Against Tender Reinvitation for Runway Work; Arbitrary Change in 'Similar Work' Definition Alleged to Exclude Lowest Bidder

8 Dec 2014

The petitioner, M/s. J. M. Mhatre Infra Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order Directing Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Temporary Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Lower Court Found That Appellants Violated Injunction by Completing Construction and Creating Third-Party Interests Despite Court Restraints.

9 Mar 2005

This appeal from order arose from a contempt application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The original plaintif...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018

3 Jun 2019

The judgment, rendered on 3 June 2019 by Justice G.S. Kulkarni of the Bombay High Court, was a writ petition concerning a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Procedural Irregularity. Rule 6(2) proviso requiring pre-deposit of 50% of disputed tax before filing declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read down as directory, not mandatory.

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Nabeel Construction Pvt. Ltd., engaged in construction services, was subjected to an investigation by the Directorate General of GST I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Refuses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Rs. 54.46 Crores. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement in the overarching Logistics Agreement and Product Purchase Agreement mandates reference to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, barring the court from passing a decree in the summary suit.

12 Mar 2018

The plaintiff, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., seeking a money dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Leave to Defend Application Not a First Statement on Substance of Dispute. Filing of application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC does not constitute submission of first statement on substance of dispute, and application under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before written statement is within time.

9 Apr 2018

The appellant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)