Search Results for "Previous Conviction"

1932 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1932 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet, with recovery of weapons under Arms Act, 1959.

The case pertains to the murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet on 31.10.2001. The deceased was last seen with the appellants Shabbir and Ravi Mandal (along with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Sudden Fight Case. The appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC was altered to Section 304 Part II IPC as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation and the appellant did not take undue advantage.

The appellant Nandlal and the deceased Lakhichand were relatives. A dispute over a common wall led to frequent quarrels. On 16.05.2006, an exchange of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Surmises Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Chain of Circumstances Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Smt. Chintambaramma and Saraswathi, who were convicted for the murder of Sahitya, the wife of L. Manjuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration Despite Initial Exculpatory Statement. Kerosene Smell and Medical Evidence Corroborate Guilt Under Sections 302 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Jagbir Singh, was convicted under Sections 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of his wife, Santosh, by pouring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 452 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness failed to identify accused and medical evidence did not support prosecution version.

The appellant, Kailas Sopan Jade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 452 of the Indian ...