Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act principles"

996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Regarding Compensation Assessment - High Court's Reduction of Compensation Set Aside Due to Improper Assessment of Functional Disability Impact on Earning Capacity Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the appellant-claimant sought enhancement of compensation awarded for injuries sustained in a road ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof. Tribunal's assessment of monthly income at Rs.19,000 based on appointment letter and salary slips without income tax returns held insufficient.

The case involves a first appeal by the Reliance General Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 29 June 2019 passed by the Mot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Proper Application of Multiplier and Future Prospects. Deceased's income assessed at Rs.15,000 per month, multiplier of 16 applied, and 40% added for future prospects as per Pranay Sethi.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Manoj Kumar Biswal, died in a vehicular accident on 09.05.2013. The claimants, his wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Parents of Deceased Unmarried Son in Motor Accident Claim — Notional Income Increased with Future Prospects and Higher Interest. The court applied the principles of Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma to compute just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, parents of deceased Nilesh Rameshchandra Kabra, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — MSRTC Liable for Negligent Driving Causing Fracture to Claimant. Permanent disability assessed at 20% with multiplier of 16 applied for loss of earning capacity under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal's Award of Rs.1,10,410/- Found Inadequate. Appellant, a housewife with 30% permanent disability, awarded enhanced compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- with interest under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sau. Arati Bhimrao Shinde, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RTI Disclosure of Contractual Information Between Private Companies and Government. Information Sought Relates to Public Activity and Falls Under Section 2(h) of RTI Act as 'Public Authority'.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s Shonkh Technology International Ltd. and M/s United Telecom Limited challenging orders of the St...