Search Results for "Cause of action"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Bench's Order Setting Aside Rejection of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Transfer of Property Pending Suit Does Not Extinguish Landlord's Cause of Action Under Section 16(1)(a) and (b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original tenant, Ratnamala Mohan Aklujkar, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Dismissal of Counterclaim. Counterclaim for Compensation Based on Vexatious Suit Not Maintainable Without Prior Adjudication of Vexatiousness.

The applicant, M/s Green Associates, filed Special Civil Suit No.50/2018 before the Trial Court for recovery of ₹21,90,125/- with interest against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Holds That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application and a Writ Petition filed by M/s J.M. Baxi & Co. (the applicant/petitioner) challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed Beyond Territorial Limits of Magistrate's Court Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court Orders in Suit for Possession. Court upholds refusal to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and appointment of commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to identify suit property.

The petitioners, S. Ramaiah, S. Siddappa, and S. Nanjappa, claimed to be owners of agricultural lands measuring 7 acres and 10 guntas in Nagarbhavi vi...