Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nathaji Tukaram Lohakare, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) — Conviction for Possession of Charas Set Aside as Search and Seizure Vitiated by Failure to Transmit Information to Immediate Official Superior.

The appellants, Daulatram @Dolly Trilok Singh, Shahmohammed Salatmatmiya Shah, and Bampada @Bamdeo @Ity Sanatan Adak, were convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gunwant Dhumbhare, a public servant, for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Forest Guard in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Khudaram Kshirsagar, a Forest Guard, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Minimum Wages Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence on Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. State fails to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Buldana, appealed against the judgment and order dated 28/06/2000 passed by the Learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Acquittal of Accused for Possession of Charas Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Accused Were Informed of Their Right to Be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Six Accused Under NDPS Act for Possession of 2.5 kg Charas — Sentence Reduced to 10 Years RI and Fine of Rs 50,000 Each. Court Holds That Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act Does Not Vitiate Conviction When Contraband is Recovered from Bag, Not Person.

The appellants, six individuals, were convicted by the Special Judge in Special Sessions Case No. 370 of 2001 for an offence punishable under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Rationing Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness testimony insufficient.

The appellant, Pandharinath Shelke, was a Rationing Officer at the Rationing Office, Kurla. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay in S...