Search Results for "legal bar"

6708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Mere use of caste name without insulting intent does not attract Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

The case arises from an appeal filed by ten accused persons against the order of the Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocates in SC/ST Act Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Allegations of Caste-Based Insult and Criminal Conspiracy Found Vague and Lacking Essential Ingredients Under Section 3 of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 120-B, 504, 506 IPC.

The petitioners, four practising advocates at Malegaon Bar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. II C.R.No.3027/2004 registered ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Mandatory and Perpetual Injunction in Property Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Appellant/Defendant Wrongfully Locked Respondent/Plaintiff Out of Premises and Removed Fixtures.

The respondent/plaintiff, Wilfred Fernandes, proprietor of M/s. Jesuwil Travel and Tours, filed a suit for mandatory and perpetual injunction against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement of Necessity Case — Plaintiff Entitled to Use Disputed Way Despite Earlier Withdrawn Suit. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Does Not Bar Fresh Suit When Subject Matter Differs and Withdrawal Was Without Liberty.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for declaration of easement of necessity and injunction concerning a disputed way over Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Whether Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Can Give Evidence by Affidavit. Court Considers Application for Quashing of Proceeding Permitting Accused's Affidavit and Rejection of Section 311 Cr.P.C. Application.

The petitioner, as complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sought quashing of the proceeding...