Search Results for "impleading application"

528 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to NLSIU's Separate Admission Test NLAT — Upholds University's Autonomy in Admission Process. NLSIU's decision to conduct its own entrance exam for 2020-21, deviating from CLAT, was held to be within its statutory powers under the NLSIU Act, 1986, and not arbitrary.

The judgment arises from a public interest writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, father of a st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Mother Against Father for Custody of Minor Child. Father's Custody Held Not Unlawful as Both Parents Have Equal Rights; Dispute to Be Adjudicated Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The petitioner, Mrs. Namita Mahendra Thanai, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking production of her mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's award of Rs.40 per sq ft for acquired land upheld as market value based on sale instances and location.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), the acquiring body, against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...