Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appellant's Letters Patent Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Single Judge's Order. Delay Condonation Denied as Unexplained; Appeals Found Devoid of Merit on Substance.

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Vasharambhai Sagharambhai Bharvad against a common judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Aakash Educational Services Limited Challenging Arbitral Award — Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Contract Interpretation Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aakash Educational Services Limited, filed two writ petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Port Trust as Barred by Limitation Under Section 120 of Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Suit filed beyond six months from accrual of cause of action is not maintainable.

The plaintiff, American President Lines Ltd. and others, filed a suit against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT) and Nahar Industrial E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Pending Suits Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only before filing of first statement on substance of dispute, not to pending suits.

The petitioner, HMT Watches Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Leave and License Dispute — Petitioner's Breach of Agreement Upheld. Arbitrator's Award of Rs. 90 Lakhs Damages with Interest Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Ropa Plastics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Debtors' Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Consent Decree Dispute. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount by Stipulated Date Renders Debtors Liable for Full Decretal Amount Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The petitioning creditor, Videocon Industries Ltd., filed Suit No. 1891 of 2000 against M/s Akar Laminators and the two judgment debtors, V.T. Seth & ...