Search Results for "Section 33(3)"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Development Expenditure Case. Expenditure on Development of New Products Held Revenue Expenditure as Incurred to Maintain Existing Business.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case - Claimants Awarded Higher Market Value and Separate Compensation for Structures and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1500 per R for Jirayat Land Based on Sale Instances Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned land in village Kuslumb, Taluka Patoda, District Beed, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Award Upheld. The court found no error in the Tribunal's assessment of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of Rajesh Shah in a vehicular accident.

The case involves an appeal by the New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 23rd September 2011 passed by the Motor Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Test Identification Parade Not Conducted Promptly and Identification in Court Without Prior TIP Held Insufficient Under Section 395 r/w 397 IPC.

The appellants, Chandra Sudhakar Shetty and Haresh Ramesh Patel @ Gaunda, were convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence. Negligence of Driver Established Through Oral Testimony and Site Inspection Report, Entitling Claimant to Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laximan Vithoba Gaunkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Agent's Suit for Accounts Against Principal in Case Involving Promissory Note. Oral Agreement to Defer Enforcement of Promissory Note Until Accounting Held Provable as Condition Precedent Under Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The litigation arose out of a dispute between an agent and his principals. The agent sued the principals for rendition of accounts for the period of h...