Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction and Declaration Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The appellant, Sri B.N. Devaraju, filed a second appeal before the Karnataka High Court against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Whether Land Acquisition Act Permits Acquisition of Building Part Without Underlying Land; State's Appeal Against High Court Quashing of Acquisition Without Land Under Consideration

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court which quashed land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...