Search Results for "Regularization"

662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declines Relief Under Article 32 for Property Dispute. Petitioners advised to seek remedy through recall or appeal of the Bombay High Court judgment.

The Supreme Court of India, exercising jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, dismissed a writ petition seeking to declare a High Court ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Directly Recruited Assistant Professors Seeking Stepping Up of Pay Based on Juniors' Pay. Rule 21 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 Not Applicable Where Anomaly Arises from Counting of Ad Hoc Services of Junior Colleagues.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by directly recruited Assistant Professors (the appellants) against the judgment of the Division ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...