Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Sealing Procedures. Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband was same as seized sample.

The petitioner, Sri K K Suresh, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Ponnampet in CC No.523/2011 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Drug Offender Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse and Ground Cases. Non-Commercial Quantity of Kanja Recovered Insufficient to Invoke Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982.

The petitioner, N.Mahalakshmi, wife of the detenu Prakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence to Minimum in NDPS Case Considering First-Time Offender and Family Circumstances. The Court reduced the sentence from fifteen years to ten years for possession of 10.496 kgs of charas under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Shyam Prashad, was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possession of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-supply of Translated Documents. Detention Order Held Violative of Article 22(5) as Kannada Translations of Relied-upon Court Order Sheets Were Not Furnished, Precluding Effective Representation.

The case arose from a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Jayamma, the mother of detenu Ravikumar @ Kumara @ Tango, challenging a preventive detentio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Forfeiture of Cash and Fixed Deposits in NDPS Case Despite Acquittal of Accused. Court upholds forfeiture of proceeds of narcotics trafficking under Section 8(c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appellant, Sankapaka Laxman Bhoomaiah @ Babu, was the original accused No.1 in NDPS Special Case No. 208/1989 before the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) ...