Search Results for "IPC 294"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Husain Chotumiya Shaikh, was preventively detained by an order dated 30.12.2025 passed by the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents do not justify preventive detention without showing threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sahilkhan @ Mota Maniyar Rashidahemad Pathan, through his mother Sama Sultana Rashidahemad Pathan, challenged a preventive detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Shabbir @ Bidi S/o Mohammad Shekh, was preventively detained by an order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Quashed as Mechanical Exercise of Power Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Sakir @ Bono Rustambhai Shekh, through his mother Habibabanu Rustambhai Shekh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt or Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt.

The applicants, Ravindra s/o Bhimrao Khillare, Seema w/o Ravindra Khillare, Deepak s/o Bhimrao Khillare, and Kalpana w/o Deepak Khillare, filed a crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anwarkhan Sandukhan Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.317 of 2000 for the murder o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Process in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Vague Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Particulars of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Cannot Sustain Proceedings Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners, who are relatives of the husband of respondent no.2, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Testimony. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sou.Bhikabai Bhagwan Herode, was convicted by the trial court under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly pushing th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Forgery and Criminal Conspiracy Case. Accused convicted under Sections 468 and 120B IPC for forging a medical certificate to claim false compensation.

The judgment concerns three criminal revision applications filed by Dinguram Ramaji Sangore, Dinbandhu Fatik Samaddar, and Tridev Vikas Mujumdar again...