Search Results for "Auction Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Auction Rules"

823 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 823 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

23 Jun 2017

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 — Time Limit for Obtaining Environmental Clearance Upheld. Rule 8-B requiring quarry lease holders to obtain environmental clearance within 24 months from commencement of amendment rules is held to be reasonable and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, holders of quarry leases for minor minerals, challenged the validity of Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Interim Custody of Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Implicated, Vehicle Not Used for Conveyance of Contraband. Lorry owner's application for interim custody allowed as vehicle was hired for lawful transport and owner was not an accused, with no evidence of owner's complicity.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, Denash, is the owner of a lorry bearing registration number TN 52 Q 0315 (Ashok Leyland, 14 wheeler). The vehicle was lawfully hired fo...

High Court

Writ Petition No. 2353 of 2013: Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Notices Issued Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Amidst Ownership Dispute

14 Jul 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Land Allotment Policy for Cooperative Societies in Andhra Pradesh — Violation of Article 14 and Lack of Transparency. Preferential allotment of government land at basic rates to MPs, MLAs, Judges, AIS officers, and journalists held arbitrary and unconstitutional.

13 Dec 2024

The case involves cross appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 05.01.2010, which partly allowed writ petitio...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)