Search Results for "temporary orders"

2523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Permanency and Equal Pay. Court Upholds Permanency for Workmen Completing 180 Days and Daily Wage Calculation at 1/26th of Monthly Salary Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Shrirampur Municipal Council, a local body constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats & Industrial Townshi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Status of Voluntary Health Workers as Workmen Entitled to Permanency. Municipal Corporation's Scheme of Voluntary Health Workers does not create a master-servant relationship, but workers are entitled to permanency under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of petitions concerns Voluntary Health Workers appointed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, particularly in relation to their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Remand in Industrial Dispute Over Transfer of Employment. Contract of Service Held Not Transferable Unilaterally; Dismissal by Transferee Establishment Invalid Absent Termination of Original Employment Under C.P. & Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947.

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute where Respondent No. 1, originally employed in the appellant-firm's factory at Kamptee, was later directed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Striking Out of Defence in Suit for Specific Performance. Defence of Defendant No.2 Restored as Trial Court's Discretion to Strike Out Defence Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC Requires Willful Disobedience of Injunction Order.

The Petitioner, Sanjay Thakkar, was Defendant No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.144 of 2016 filed by Respondent No.1, Bhojja Shantu Shetty, for enforcemen...