KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "section 13(4)"
1425 result(s) found
Found 1425 result(s)
High Court
- 56
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Conviction of Police Sub-Inspector Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Alleged Invalid Sanction and Contradictory Evidence. Appeal Raises Questions on Prior Bail Release Undermining Demand of Bribe Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
21 Dec 2020The case arose from a criminal appeal preferred by G. Omprakash, a Police Sub-Inspector, against his conviction and sentence by the Special Judge unde...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for Enhancement of Compensation — Reference Court Erred in Dismissing Petition for Want of Prosecution Without Considering Merits. The High Court directed restoration of the reference petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for fresh adjudication on merits.
18 Jun 2018The appellant, Vitthal Madan Patil, was the owner of land bearing Survey No. 39/6 admeasuring 01 Hectare 60 R situated at village Kolsur, Taluka Omerg...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.
11 Jun 2014The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Applicability of Model Standing Order 4-C in Letters Patent Appeal. The Single Judge Had Held That Model Standing Order 4-C Does Not Automatically Apply to Establishments with Certified Standing Orders Lacking Similar Provision, Relying on May & Baker Ltd. v. Kishore Jaikishandas Icchaporia.
8 Feb 2005The dispute arose from the termination of Shri Gangadhar Balgopal Nair, a temporary unskilled workman employed by Voltas Limited, a factory at Thane e...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Supervisor Engineer in Rash Driving Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Overt Act. Petitioner, a supervisor engineer, cannot be held liable under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act for accident caused by driver of tipper lorry in absence of any allegation of rash or negligent act on his part.
15 Feb 2019The petitioner, Sri M. Srinivas, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.10878/2016 pending before ...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Supervisor Engineer in Rash Driving Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Overt Act. Petitioner, a supervisor engineer, was charged under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Sections 134(a)(b) r/w 187 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for a fatal accident caused by the driver of a tipper lorry; court held that mere supervisory role does not attract criminal liability without evidence of direct involvement or abetment.
15 Feb 2019The petitioner, Sri M. Srinivas, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.
30 Dec 2025The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Mutation Entry in Private Forest Case — Government Failed to Prove Land Was Forest Under MPFA Act. Collector's Order Under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 Directing Deletion of Government's Name from Record of Rights Upheld as Mutation Entry Was Made Without Notice and Without Proper Inquiry.
11 Aug 2022The petitioners, Sunil Shamrao Patil and Anupama Sunil Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging mutation entry No. 1736 d...
- 111
