Search Results for "removal before term"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "removal before term"

1399 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1399 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Civil Suit Pertaining to Society Dispute. Appeals Filed Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Challenging Trial Court's Order Declining to Grant Temporary Injunction Against Alleged Illegal Resolution of Rajya Vokkaligara Sangha.

7 Jul 2023

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension of Orthopedic Surgeons Under PCPNDT Act for Mandatory Suspension Upon Framing of Charges. Section 23(2) of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 mandates suspension of registration of medical practitioners upon framing of charges by a court, with no discretion for the State Medical Council.

23 Aug 2013

The petitioners, Dr. Ramineni Venugopal Somaiah and Dr. Prabhudas Solanki, both orthopedic surgeons, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Medical Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Termination and Pension Denial; Teacher Claims Protection Under Rule 47 and Exceptions for Absenteeism Period. Petitioner Contends Delay and Misapplication of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

19 Jan 2012

The writ petition arose from a long-standing dispute involving a school teacher's termination and pension claim. The petitioner was appointed as an As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)