Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Pandit Shankar Chaudhari and Subhash Kitk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Gambling Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 6 of Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 — Police Raid Conducted Without Valid Warrant or Authorisation.

The applicants, six businessmen from Nagpur, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft and Procedural Irregularities. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Dishonest Abstraction of Energy Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Ramesh s/o Balwant Patil, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 14 of 2005 for theft of elec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as trap witnesses were interested and evidence of demand and acceptance was not credible.

The appellant, Chandrakant Kisan Pujari, was a Noting Assistant at the District Industries Centre, Solapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, San...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Improper Investigation. Conviction under MCOC Act set aside as procedural requirements under Section 23 of MCOC Act were not complied with.

The appellant, Siddhu @ Siddharth Ramesh Janmejay, was convicted by the Special Judge (MCOC Act), Thane, for offences under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashanand Ramji Fulekar, was convicted by the 1st Additional Principal Judge and Special Judge (CBI) on 28.1.2009 for an offence punisha...