Search Results for "money order refusal"

1249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Execution Court Order in Property Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Auction Sale for Lack of Material Irregularity. Execution Court's Refusal to Set Aside Sale Under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC Upheld as No Substantial Injury Was Proved.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No. 100051/2021 and RFA No. 100140/2021) filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Satara, which c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — In-Camera Statements Not Recorded as Required. Failure to Record In-Camera Statements and Lack of Material in Show-Cause Notice Regarding Witnesses' Fear Renders Externment Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Bilal Gulam Rasul Patel, challenged an externment order dated 15th April, 2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Thane, externi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness, but defendants cannot forfeit earnest money without proof of loss.

The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.02.2008 in respect of a suit property admeasuring 70,000...