Search Results for "hospital construction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "hospital construction"

884 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 884 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Municipal Commissioner to Consider Representation Against Unauthorized Construction Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 — Non-Consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty. The court held that a statutory authority has a duty to consider a representation on its merits and pass appropriate orders; failure to do so justifies a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, R. Mayilsamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs Strict Compliance of Fire Safety Norms for High Rise Buildings in Panaji — Public Interest Litigation on Fire Safety Measures. The Court expanded the scope of the petition to cover all high rise buildings and issued directions for inspection and compliance with fire safety regulations.

15 Dec 2022

The judgment pertains to a public interest litigation filed in 2004 by Gurudas G. Pai, raising concerns about fire safety compliance in high rise buil...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for 100% Disabled Road Accident Victim in Motor Accident Claim Case — Loss of Future Prospects Added to Notional Income. The Court held that a victim with 100% permanent disability is entitled to 50% addition towards future prospects under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The first appellant, Lalan D. @ Lal, a skilled laboure...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence Not Required for Structured Compensation. Court holds that for claims under Section 163-A, the claimant need not prove negligence; the 'arising out of use' requirement is satisfied if the vehicle was involved in the accident, even if the collision was not the direct cause of death.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents and sister of Dinesh Kadam, a 22-year-old lift mechanic who died on 11 April 2007 aft...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Dowry Death and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act applied as death occurred within seven years of marriage and dowry demand was proved.

22 Jun 2011

The appellant, Vasant Bhagwat Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, 498A of the India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Dacoity and Attempt to Commit Culpable Homicide in Extortion Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 395 and 308 IPC for participating in a dacoity and causing injuries to the complainant after threatening calls demanding money.

5 Jul 2005

The appellant, Mahesh @ Maya @ Munna Simon Makwana @ Vankar, was convicted by the Special Court under the MCOC Act for offences under Sections 120-B, ...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)