Search Results for "government land encroachment"

680 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 680 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice Under Section 131(2) of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994. Notice Quashed for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Requiring Prior Report from Village Administrative Officer or Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, T. Kumaresan, challenged a notice dated 12.02.2026 issued by the Block Development Officer, Chinna Salem, calling upon him to vacate a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Res Judicata Not Applicable as Earlier Suit Was Only for Injunction, Not Title. Former Students' Suit in Representative Capacity for Declaration of Government Ownership Maintainable Despite Earlier Injunction Decree.

The dispute pertains to a suit property bearing Sy.No.81 of Tumkur, originally belonging to Syed Md. Bokhari and Lankey. Due to non-payment of arrears...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition for Declaration of Land as Grama Natham and Permission to Run Business. Petitioner Claims Long Possession and Patta, Respondent Alleges Bogus Documents.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Land in Paramankurichi Village. Court orders consideration of representation after hearing parties within eight weeks.

The petitioner, S. Issac Newton, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...