Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Order in Commercial Suit — Suit Not Barred by Arbitration Clause as Reliefs Are Not Covered by Arbitration Agreement.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants/defendants challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Commercial Court at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Court Receiver in Property Dispute, Directs Parties to Pursue Claims Before DRT. Court holds that once a suit is transferred to DRT, the Court Receiver's role ceases and parties must seek remedies before the Tribunal.

This judgment concerns an application filed by the Court Receiver seeking discharge without passing accounts, subject to payment of costs, charges and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Arbitral Award Without Decree — Arbitral Award Cannot Be Executed Directly Under Section 38 CPC Without Prior Decree Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhar, was the judgment debtor in execution proceedings before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mysore. The dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Transferable Duty Free Licence. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of claim for damages based on alleged breach of warranty regarding transferability of advance licence.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...