Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1499 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1499 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Regarding Liability for Defects in Gas Turbine Generators. Award Deals with Claims for Damages Due to Breakdown and Repair Costs Under a Turnkey Contract.

9 Dec 2025

The dispute arises from a contract between Thermax Limited (Petitioner) and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (Respondent) for the turnkey instal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Availability of Statutory Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 against arbitral award filed beyond limitation period under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable as efficacious alternative remedy exists.

27 Oct 2020

The Central Railway (Petitioner) awarded a contract to Maharashtra Steel Fabricators & Erectors (Respondent) on 31 December 2001 and 31 March 2002 for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Arbitration Against Non-Signatory Parent Company — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 Under Contract Between Subsidiary and Contractor. Court Holds That Absence of Privity of Contract and Definition of Parties in Arbitration Clause Preclude Binding Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Sep 2012

The plaintiff, JSW ISPAT Steel Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between it and defendant No.1, Jeumo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Accused for Wilful Disobedience of Arbitrator's Order Regarding Fees. Failure to Pay Arbitrator's Fees as Directed by Order Dated 02.04.2011 Amounts to Contempt of Court Under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

13 Jun 2013

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Mr. Patrick Lawrence, proprietor of M/s. Lion Holding's, base...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against the judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Leave and Licence Dispute — Liquidated Damages Upheld for Early Termination During Lock-in Period. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the lock-in clause and award of liquidated damages was not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Globsport India Private Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 January 2012 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.

6 May 2026

The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)